Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut update#
Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut pro#
Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut software#
Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut mac#
Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut windows#

Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut pro#

NOTE: In order for Premiere Pro to “recognize” the GPU, the computer needs a minimum of 768 MB of RAM on the GPU. Also, GPU support is a newly-added feature in Adobe Media Encoder, which handles exporting duties for Premiere.

Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut mac#

Multiple GPUs, such as the new Mac Pro, help speed exports. Hardware acceleration for transitions and effects that are GPU-enabled.The CPU is used to play all video in their camera native format and camera native frame rate.

Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut update#

NOTE: As I was writing this article, Adobe released the 8.0.1 update to Premiere which focuses almost exclusively on improving performance. (Both FCP 7 and Premiere allow mixing different frame sizes, frame rates, and codecs on the same Timeline.) Here’s an Adobe blog that explains this in more detail. In fact, Premiere can handle projects larger than 6k and Adobe actually has a few customers testing 8k.

Premiere Pro supports all modern codecs and cameras. Also, because it was only 32-bit enabled, FCP 7 would only access 4 GB of RAM, regardless of how much RAM was installed on your system. NOTE: Final Cut Pro 7 only effectively used 1 processor and, with just a few exceptions didn’t support the GPU at all. It is fully 64-bit, multi-threaded and multi-core, and fully supports the GPU in your system. Premiere Pro supports all the latest Mac hardware.

Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut windows#

Windows debate, supporting both platforms gives editors the ability to choose the best platform for their work. Without getting into the inevitable Mac vs. Premiere Pro runs on both Mac and Windows systems. It requires a separate article, which I’ve not yet written, to compare Premiere Pro CC to Final Cut Pro X, because that comparison is a whole lot more complex. NOTE: In this article I’m comparing Premiere Pro to Final Cut Pro 7. Given that as background, earlier this week I sat down with the folks at Adobe to explore the question of “If I were a Final Cut Pro 7 user, why should I consider Premiere Pro?” Over recent versions, it has seemed to me that Adobe was working hard to have Premiere Pro achieve feature parity with FCP 7 though from a performance point of view, Premiere blows the doors off Final Cut Pro 7. (This is not the same as saying film and tape don’t exist, simply that they are less important than digital media files.) It looked at the new world of digital video and built itself upon a foundation where film and tape are no longer important. In other words, Premiere Pro CC looks and operates very much like Final Cut Pro 7.įinal Cut Pro X, on the other hand, took a different path. If I were going to emulate something, I’d pick the biggest market I could find. Final Cut Pro 5 – 7 had something like 2 million users, while Premiere Pro had only a fraction of that. The big sea change occurred with CS6, when Premiere adopted FCP 7’s keyboard shortcuts, much of its nomenclature, its media handling and many of its features. Randy, whom I’ve met twice, did not do all the programming – these applications are far too complex for one individual to program in their entirety – but he set the strategic engineering direction for all of them.įrom my point of view, Adobe has modeled recent versions of Premiere Pro after Final Cut Pro 7 extending it to run efficiently on today’s hardware. In an interesting quirk of history, Adobe Premiere Pro, Final Cut Pro 7 and Final Cut Pro X were all designed by the same man: Randy Ubillos. We only had two hours for the discussion, so there wasn’t enough time to discuss every difference between the two applications. And, it should not surprise you that Adobe thinks that Premiere Pro is the application of choice. Recently, I sat down with the folks at Adobe to discuss that very question. So, why should a Final Cut Pro 7 editor consider Adobe Premiere Pro CC? In other words, both applications deliver world-class, high-quality results. (Though they could tell by looking at titles and effects, which vary by vendor.)

Pro video formats does not find qualified copy of final cut software#

And, if you were to edit a project in either one a trained expert could not tell by looking at your cut which software you used. Both applications are frequently updated with bug fixes and new features. Both are made by excellent companies, with devoted teams of programmers supporting and improving them. Let me start by saying both applications are used by professionals around the world every day.

Should I buy Adobe Premiere Pro or Apple Final Cut Pro X?”

One of the most popular questions I get asked is: “I’m using Final Cut Pro 7.